
(1) Community knowledge is for use - Since the value of a community is the knowledge it possesses, people who leave a community will have memories. Yet, little has been carried out in public libraries to digitize local resources.
(2) Every user should have access to his or her community knowledge - Knowledge is for sharing; community knowledge becomes valuable only when it can be accessed and used by others. Facilitating the creation and wider use of this knowledge should be the new role of public libraries.
(3) All community knowledge should be made available to its users - No community knowledge should be allowed to be wasted. Rather, public libraries should facilitate the creation of such knowledge so that it is recorded and preserved. Nothing should be lost.
(4) Save the time of the user in creating and finding community knowledge - Just like the paper records of past lives, the digital records of current lives are accumulating in an ad hoc manner but in a much greater quantity and variety. Hence, public library staff should fill the role of advisors on local content creation, management, and implementation of controlled description, as well as access schemes.
(5) Local community knowledge grows continually - Because community knowledge creation is a continual process, public libraries should act as local knowledge hubs must use existing standards and technology for digitization as well as metadata for the management of, and access to, the digitized resources
2 comments:
Definitely food for thought.
I attended a meeting today with public, academic and school librarians/information professionals over the definitions of information literacy in a digital world. One of the areas we found challenging was coming up with a succinct explanation of the library's role amidst all this technology to our policy makers. I'll be checking out that Chowdhury, Poulter, and McMenemy article for ideas.
I'm glad you found this posting useful!
Allan
Post a Comment