Friday, June 08, 2007

Why Librarianship?

At dinner today, a fellow colleague asked what are my perceptions of the the profession and the job market. My answer? I am optimistic. While there are the usual problems of budget shrinkages, lower gate counts, competition with bookstores, job cuts (...the list goes on...), this isn't the end. Instead, I am encouraged when I look at our profession from another viewpoint, and less "narrowly" on the traditional concept of librarianship. What do I mean?

Everywhere I see, job ads are popping up with job descriptions that MLIS degree holders possess. Particularly in non-traditional settings, librarians are suited for positions once limited to business, communications, and computer science graduates. Because of the Internet, librarians are partitioned into positions that require unique and specific needs. Instead of a dying breed, librarians are part of a profession that is expanding into different horizons and possibilities. Indeed, physicals walls are crumbling and replaced by virtual ones. Why will we never disappear? I argue four reasons:

(1) Technology – Not just the internet, but social software, “wireless” technology, etc. Librarians are known to be at the forefront of translating technology to users. First it was the OPAC, then the internet, now Web 2.0.

(2) Intelligence – Librarians all have master degrees. The minimum admissions GPA is about at least a B (76%+ above at SLAIS). Librarians are intelligent, well-read, and usually pretty damn creative - all traits for success in the information profession.

(3) Searching – As long as journals and articles exist, there will be databases. As long as databases exist, there will be the need for people to not only search them, but also to train others. With free free search engines, even better.

(4) Management – Librarianship is one of those rare professions where managing is required practically from Day 1. As managers in such positions, these skills are transferable to almost any job. Hence, librarians take heed: it's our time to shine.

2 comments:

Dean Giustini said...

Allan,
I'm full of questions today. I'm pleased to feel the optimism you have - keep it. It's an important trait. What would you do in a scenario where your boss questioned your blogging, its purpose in the context of your job? What if you disagreed with each other and she asked you to stop? This happens when the traditionalists collide with the early adopters of technology.

Dean

Allan said...

Blogging, in my opinion, is an alternative (but more intimate) form of publishing (in trade journals and books). Hence, if it is acceptable - even encouraged - for librarians and academics, then why not for blogging? If one were blogging about unrelated and inappropriate topics, then it's understandable for criticism. But if one is to blog about LIS, which in the end only forwards our profession and the information needs of others, then how can it be anything but worthwhile?